Dylan Schiemann

Per many online reports, it seems that the US media outlets are censoring the presidential debate results and questions asked about said censorship. Now, I had no idea anyone actually watched debates any more, but when I learned that a large number of candidates were invited, I realized that there might actually have been a reason to watch this time.

It appears that big media is intentionally ignoring longshot candidates that mention the constitution and question the intentions of the two parties currently in power. That’s about as un-American and anti-meritocratic as it gets. The thing that is almost as frustrating is that the sites that write about these issues come across as conspiracy theorists that everyone should dismiss. The article linked above, while from a site that is typically dismissed as being overly sensational, does a better job than usual of just stating the facts. But that begs the question, why can’t people attempting to uncover the truth about events that infer highly questionable conduct of our government do so in a way that doesn’t put off people that have a brain?